Teaching Strategies and Learner Participation in Grade 5 Classrooms: Insights from Philippines Public Elementary School

Authors

  • Mary Ann Besa NORTHEASTERN COLLEGE
  • Prof. Matronillo Martin Northeastern College, Santiago City

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i1.269

Abstract

Learner participation is a critical indicator of instructional effectiveness and meaningful learning, particularly in the elementary grades where engagement shapes foundational academic and social development. This study examined the teaching strategies employed in Grade 5 classrooms and their influence on learner participation at a Philippine public elementary school. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, data were collected through classroom observations, teacher questionnaires, and learner participation surveys administered to Grade 5 teachers and pupils. Teaching strategies were categorized into interactive, learner-centered, and traditional approaches, while learner participation was measured across behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions. Findings revealed that interactive and learner-centered teaching strategies were frequently utilized and were significantly associated with higher levels of learner participation. Behavioral participation emerged as the most prominent dimension, followed by emotional and cognitive participation. The results underscore the importance of varied and responsive instructional strategies in fostering active learner involvement. Implications for instructional planning, teacher professional development, and policy support in public elementary schools are discussed.

References

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.

https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.31.1.j463w24n1r2215p1

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Besa, M. A., & Martin, M. (2026). Teaching Strategies and Learner Participation in Grade 5 Classrooms: Insights from Philippines Public Elementary School. Studies in Technology and Education, 5(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i1.269

Most read articles by the same author(s)