Effectiveness of Multisensory Instruction in Reading Skills of Grade 1 Pupils

Authors

  • Kae Ann Bautista Apayao State College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i3.439

Keywords:

comprehension, Grade 1 pupils, literacy development, multisensory instruction, Phil-IRI, reading performance, word recognition

Abstract

This study determined the effectiveness of multisensory instruction in improving the reading skills of Grade 1 pupils at Bagu Elementary School, Pamplona, Cagayan during School Year 2024–2025. The research addressed the problem of low reading performance among beginning learners, particularly in word recognition and reading comprehension. A one-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was employed involving twenty (20) Grade 1 pupils. The Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) served as the primary instrument in measuring reading performance before and after the five-week multisensory intervention. The multisensory instruction integrated visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic activities such as tracing, phonics drills, guided reading, and story retelling to enhance learner engagement and retention. Results showed a notable improvement in pupils’ post-test mean scores in both word recognition and comprehension. The t-test for dependent samples revealed a statistically significant difference between pre-test and post-test results, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The study concludes that multisensory instruction is an effective approach in strengthening early literacy skills and may serve as a valuable strategy for improving reading development among Grade 1 learners.

References

Birsh, J. R., & Carreker, S. (2018). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Department of Education. (2018). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) Manual 2018. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2022). Basic education learning continuity plan. Department of Education.

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.

Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Human learning (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Viking Press.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Bautista, K. A. (2026).   Effectiveness of Multisensory Instruction in Reading Skills of Grade 1 Pupils. Studies in Technology and Education, 5(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i3.439