COMPETENCIES AND CHALLENGES OF OUT OF FIELD TEACHERS ENROLLED IN MAED SOCIAL SCIENCE PROGRAM BASIS FOR POLICY FORMULATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i3.404Keywords:
Competencies, Challenges, Out of Field teachers, Social Science Program, PolicyAbstract
This descriptive-correlational study aimed to examined the competencies and challenges of out-of-field teachers enrolled in the Master of Arts in Education major in Social Science Program at Isabela State University, Main Campus. Results show that Out-of-field teachers enrolled in the MAED Social Science Program generally possess adequate self-assessed competencies across all three domains. Their strongest competency domain is communication and interaction skills, reflecting their capacity to connect with and engage students effectively. Pedagogical skills were also rated highly, indicating that teachers have developed sound instructional strategies through experience and graduate study. Subject knowledge, while acceptable, remains the relatively weakest domain, highlighting the inherent challenge that out-of-field assignment poses in terms of content mastery. Professional development opportunities represent the most pressing challenge among out-of-field teachers. There is no significant correlation between the self-assessed competencies of out-of-field teachers and the challenges they encounter in teaching. It recommends that Administrators of the MAED Social Science Programs may adopt the Policy Recommendation as an output of this study. Graduate School Administrators should institutionalize a system of competency self-assessment at the point of admission and at regular intervals throughout the program Policy-level interventions should address the systemic dimension of out-of-field teaching challenges. Funding for targeted professional development programs, updated instructional resources, and technology infrastructure should be prioritized for schools where out-of-field teaching is prevalent.
References
Annurul, A., Sundawa, D., & Samlawi, F. (2018). The correlation between teachers’ competencies and students’ learning outcomes in social science subject. International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 3(2), 36–43.
Bautista, R. G., & Ocampo, D. A. (2020). The learning action cell as a school-based continuing professional development strategy for Filipino teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080314
Canuto, P., Choycawen, M., & Pagdawan, R. (2024). The influence of teaching competencies on teachers’ performance and students’ academic achievement in primary science education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.29
Commission on Higher Education. (2021). CHED memorandum order no. 15, s. 2021: Policies, standards and guidelines for graduate programs in education. Republic of the Philippines.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Research on teaching and teacher education and its influences on policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639597
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
Department of Education. (2022). Basic education report 2022. Republic of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph
Donitsa-Schmidt, S., Zuzovsky, R., & Topaz, B. (2020). Out-of-field teaching as a professional development opportunity. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1570323
European Commission. (2018). Teaching and learning in schools in Europe: Policies and practices. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/63901
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882
Hermoso, R., & Brobo, M. (2023). Personal and professional competencies of teachers: Bases for effective teaching. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 5(9), 44–52.
Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9333-4
Hobbs, L. (2017). Out-of-field teaching: Is it a problem, and what can be done? In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the phenomenon of teaching out-of-field (pp. 3–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6200-6_1
Hobbs, L., & Porsch, R. (2021). Teaching out-of-field: Challenges for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1985390
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Kenny, J., Hobbs, L., & Whannell, R. (2020). Designing professional development for out-of-field teachers. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1613256
Lozano-Peña, G., Sáez-Delgado, F., López-Angulo, Y., & Mella-Norambuena, J. (2021). Teachers’ social-emotional competence: Models and recommendations for educational quality. Sustainability, 13(22), 12730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212730
Mastrokoukou, S., Longobardi, C., & Prino, L. E. (2022). The relationship between teacher competencies, challenges, and teaching quality: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 865500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865500
Molapo, M. R., & Malatji, K. S. (2024). Teacher competency in social sciences: Aligning pedagogical roles with social realist perspectives. Journal of Social Sciences, 78(1–3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566756.2024/78.1-3.3523
UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. UNESCO Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Studies in Technology and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Studies in Technology and Education (STE) are freely accessible under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license grants users the right to read, download, copy, distribute, and link to the full texts for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given and that the original work remains unaltered and unchanged.
This article is made available in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.