Pedagogical Practices and Learner Participation in Learner-Centered Primary Classrooms at Dipaluda Primary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v4i4.256Keywords:
learner-centered pedagogy, pedagogical practices, learner participation, primary education, qualitative case studyAbstract
Learner-centered pedagogy has been widely promoted in primary education as a means of fostering active learner participation, agency, and meaningful engagement. However, empirical studies that examine how learner-centered pedagogical practices are enacted in everyday classroom contexts, particularly in rural and public primary schools, remain limited. This study examined pedagogical practices and learner participation in learner-centered primary classrooms at Dipaluda Primary School. Anchored in constructivist and learner-centered learning frameworks, the study employed a qualitative case study design involving classroom observations and semi-structured interviews wit
h teachers and pupils. Findings revealed that pedagogical practices emphasizing facilitation, dialogue, collaborative activities, and contextualized tasks encouraged active learner participation and responsibility for learning. Conversely, structural constraints such as large class sizes, time limitations, and curriculum demands moderated the consistency of learner-centered enactment. The study concludes that learner participation in primary classrooms is shaped not only by instructional strategies but also by teacher–learner relationships and institutional conditions. Implications for primary teaching practice, school leadership, and policy support are discussed.
References
Belarga, B., Guiquing-Clemente, B., Tulawie, A., Alih, C., Caban, R., & Manois, F. R. (2025). From Page to Praxis: The Role of Regional Literature in Shaping Culturally Grounded Teaching Methods in HEIs. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI2), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.206
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher–pupil interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715–730.
Bonoan, K. C., Bunagan, K. A., Calangi , A. D., Chan, E. P., Corpuz , L. P. ., Deseo, J. M. ., Suarez, R. H., Sumulong, B. I. ., & Flores, A. R. (2021). A Comparative Study on the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) on the Preventive Measures Against Covid-19 of the Residents in Rural (Lobo, Batangas) and Urban (Taguig City, Metro Manila) Areas in the Philippines . International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 1(3), 77–123. Retrieved from https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/35
Buncag, R. (2022). Parent-Assisted Modular Reading Program: Its Effect on Reading Performance During the Covid-19 Pandemic of Grade 5 Pupils of Biwag Elementary School, Tallag Cabagan Isabela. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(July Special Issue), 39–50. https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/154
Caliboso, J., Bagalay, B., Santiago, M. Bayan, R., Aguinaldo, I., & Belo, J. (2025). Literary Texts as Cultural Tools: A Study on Contextualized Learning Strategies in Philippine Higher Education. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.205
Camiring-Picpican, H., Flores, K., Caban, R., Mohadali, S., Galdonez, D., & Alih, C. (2025). Pedagogical Innovations Based on Philippine Cultural Practices: A Framework for Culturally Responsive Teaching in Higher Education. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI2), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.168
Caranguian, C. B. (2022). Family-related Factors Influencing Success in the Licensure Examination for Teachers. International Journal of Educational Sciences. 38 (1-3), 62-69.
Caranguian, C. B. (2023). Level of Parental Involvement as a Predictor of Academic Achievement and School Adjustment. Universidad de Granada.14(3), 138-143.
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher–student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher–student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: Autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.
Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(1), 1–14.
Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(2), 203–220.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Studies in Technology and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Studies in Technology and Education (STE) are freely accessible under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license grants users the right to read, download, copy, distribute, and link to the full texts for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given and that the original work remains unaltered and unchanged.
This article is made available in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.