Flexible Learning, Protocol Implementation, and Institutional Resilience in Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Evidence from Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines

Authors

  • Leonida Tayaban Ifugao State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i4.655

Keywords:

TVET; flexible learning; blended learning; distance education; institutional resilience; technical-vocational education

Abstract

This study examined the implementation of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) arrangements during the COVID-19 “new normal” in Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines, and identified the institutional constraints that shaped flexible training delivery. Using a descriptive-comparative design, the study involved 50 respondents 12 administrators and 38 trainers from 12 public and private technical-vocational institutions. Data were gathered through a survey instrument based on TESDA Circular No. 66, series of 2020, and analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, t-test, F-test, and thematic ranking of reported challenges. Results showed that blended learning was the dominant delivery mode (66%), while 34% of respondents reported using a combination of distance and face-to-face learning. Overall, enrollment protocols were only partially implemented (M = 2.15), whereas training delivery (M = 2.63), assessment (M = 2.96), and administrative protocols (M = 2.92) were fully implemented. Administrators and trainers generally shared similar assessments of implementation. However, significant differences emerged in enrollment implementation by mode of delivery during MECQ and by institutional years of existence, and in assessment implementation by mode. The most frequently reported challenge was the lack of online learning resources (f = 44), followed by poor internet connectivity (f = 20), limited trainers’ IT skills (f = 10), insufficient administrative support (f = 4), and unavailable tools or facilities (f = 3). The findings suggest that regulatory compliance was strongest in areas supported by explicit monitoring and mandatory protocols, while digital learning capacity remained the principal weakness. The study argues that post-pandemic TVET resilience requires sustained investment in digital learning resources, trainer capability, connectivity, flexible enrollment systems, and hybrid models that preserve hands-on competency development.

References

Alvarez, A. V., Jr. (2020). Learning from the problems and challenges in blended learning: Basis for faculty development and program enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 112–132.

Bagale, S. (2015). Technical education and vocational training for sustainable development. Journal of Training and Development, 1, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.3126/jtd.v1i0.13085

Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2020). Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education. VoxEU.

Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3

Dumbiri, D. N., & Nwadiani, C. O. (2020). Challenges facing application of e-learning facilities in vocational and technical education programs in South Nigeria universities. Asian Journal of Vocational Education and Humanities, 1(2), 1–8.

Hoftijzer, M., Levin, V., Santos, I., & Weber, M. (2020). TVET systems’ response to COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. World Bank.

International Labour Organization. (2021). Skills development in the time of COVID-19: Taking stock of the initial responses in technical and vocational education and training.

Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., Gozali, I., Triwidayati, K. R., Utami, T. S. D., & Jemadi, F. (2020). Secondary school language teachers’ online learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 803–832.

Ndahi, H. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the delivery of TVET in CARICOM Member States. International Labour Organization.

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

TESDA. (2020). Guidelines in implementing flexible learning in TVET (TESDA Circular No. 062, s. 2020). Technical Education and Skills Development Authority.

TESDA. (2020). TVET arrangements towards the new normal during the COVID-19 crisis (TESDA Circular No. 66A, s. 2020). Technical Education and Skills Development Authority.

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).

UNESCO. (2017). Using ICTs and blended learning in transforming TVET. UNESCO/Commonwealth of Learning/UNESCO-UNEVOC.

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2024). Elevating TVET for a just and sustainable future for all: UNESCO-UNEVOC medium-term strategy 2024–2026. UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (n.d.). Digital transformation in TVET. UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (n.d.). Trends in digital skills training for TVET teachers and trainers. UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Tayaban, L. (2026). Flexible Learning, Protocol Implementation, and Institutional Resilience in Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Evidence from Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines. Studies in Technology and Education, 5(4), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i4.655