Finding Their Voice in the Early Grades Grade 1 Learners’ Experiences of Classroom Participation and Meaningful Learning

Authors

  • Keithley Anne V. Evera Isabela Colleges Incorporated

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i4.647

Abstract

Classroom participation in the early grades is often equated with speaking frequently or answering correctly. Such a narrow view can overlook how young children participate through listening, gesture, peer interaction, drawing, manipulating materials, demonstration, and tentative talk. This qualitative case study is designed to explore how Grade 1 learners at Cauayan West Central School in Cauayan City, Isabela experience classroom participation and how they associate those experiences with meaningful learning. The study adopts a child-centered, sociocultural perspective and proposes triangulation of non-participant classroom observations, brief developmentally appropriate learner conversations, teacher interviews, and learner-produced artifacts. Reflexive thematic analysis is used to examine patterns across verbal and non-verbal participation while attending to negative and deviant cases. The analytic model developed for the study organizes expected lines of inquiry around familiarity and willingness to participate, teacher-created safety, peer interaction, multimodal participation, activity-based meaning making, and barriers such as fear of error, pace, vocabulary, and unequal opportunities to contribute. Importantly, the article does not treat talk frequency as a proxy for learning; meaningful learning is evidenced through connection, explanation, retention, application, and the learner’s ability to make sense of classroom experience. The study offers a context-sensitive framework for making Grade 1 participation more inclusive and pedagogically meaningful. Empirical claims and verbatim quotations must be finalized from the actual dataset before journal submission.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024

Lundy, L. (2007). “Voice” is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4

Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Evera, K. A. (2026). Finding Their Voice in the Early Grades Grade 1 Learners’ Experiences of Classroom Participation and Meaningful Learning . Studies in Technology and Education, 5(4), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v5i4.647